DanM has more Dark Knight pics

knight02thumb.jpgThe Dark Horizons website has images from the new Batman movie The Dark Knight.  Here are a few. Enjoy.

 

Click the pics for the full size image.

knight17.jpg

knight02.jpg

knight07.jpg

knight08.jpg

knight09.jpg

knight14.jpg

knight15.jpg

knight16.jpg
 
Thanks to 
Dark Horizons logo
for the pics!

42 Responses to “DanM has more Dark Knight pics”

  1. Chris Says:

    My first reaction was to say that I don’t care for the visual direction they’re taking this movie. But then I remember that I thought the exact same thing about Batman Begins before I saw it, and I loved that movie. It looked exactly as it should have.

    These pics are clearly shot in full light. Once these are processed, cropped, reframed, and digitally adjusted to make them look like they were shot at night, I think these will be awesome. I’m really looking forward to this movie. Cinematically speaking, 2008 has the potential to be a very good year.


    “Some men just want to watch the world burn…”
  2. Chris Says:

    You guys out there let us know if Warner Bros. forces Dark Horizons to take down the pics, and I’ll post the rest of them here. :)

  3. Quentin Says:

    And so another page is turned.
    4th Edition D&D announced.
    http://www.wizards.com/dnd/

  4. Mrs.X Says:

    Sorry not much on what they’ve done to the Joker here. Maybe when I see the movie I’ll change my mind, but so far I’m disappointed. Not much on Batman’s costume either.

  5. Chris Says:

    Q - Great, just what we need, yet another new edition of a game that fans and publishers are trying desperately to return to its roots.

    You know, there’s a reason the game isn’t selling. A lot of people really don’t like 3rd Edition. I thought it was just me, but a year or so back I heard someone refer to the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons as “a lawyer’s version of medieval fantasy combat.” How incredibly, precisely apt. Its rules heavy and over-inflated. It bogs itself down.

    There are all kinds of books out now which try to recreate the feel of the older versions of the game. I’ve almost picked up a couple of the “Dungeon Crawl Classics” modules, and Necromancer Games’s whole publishing strategy is in their slogan: “Third Edition Rules, First Edition Feel.” According to Wikipedia, even Gary Gygax, the co-creator of the original, old-school version of Dungeons & Dragons, is in on the game of recreating what he started. He’s supporting the “Castles & Crusades” supplements, which are basically simplified 3rd Edition rules that focus on playing the game and having fun rather than having to leaf through 30 books in search of a list of fucking rules for each and every situation you could ever encounter.

    They tried to take 3rd Edition down the path of the Dark Side, in what I presume was an effort to attract new players with a grittier, darker game. Look at the books; they look and feel less like Dungeons & Dragons and more like an RPG based on Sauron’s and Saruman’s forces of evil. Everyone in there looks like a fucking orc or ringwraith; even the elves are grimey looking and covered with spikes. D&D was never meant to be a dark, grim game. Certainly you can play it that way, but really its best kept simple and lighter. Dungeons & Dragons is best when its clever and, for lack of a better word, a little bit wholesome. It should be more like The Hobbit than The Two Towers.

    D&D 3rd Edition was released in 2000. Revised 3rd Edition, also known as v3.5, came out in 2003. 3.5 was literally hundreds of very minor, nitpicky little rules changes that required anyone interested in keeping current to buy hundreds of dollars worth of new books. Now Dungeons & Dragons 4th Edition is supposed to drop in May 2008. Are fans of the game really supposed to buy all new, increasingly expensive RPG books every 3-5 years? Fuck that.

    What is 4th Edition promising to give players for their money? Lets look at the list:

    “30th level characters.” You can play that with the perfectly useful 2nd Edition high-level campaign rules.

    “Better-defined character roles.” They’re called “specializations” and “kits,” and again, they’re readily available for play with 2nd Edition rules.

    How about “expanded online content.” There are plans to support playing the game over the internet. Well, whoop-de-fuckin’-shit. How incredibly groundbreaking… if this were 1980. People have been doing this for years. And its not something the publishers came up with. Fans invented means to play online, or via message boards, and even via postal mail, and they did it LONG before TSR/Wizards Of The Coast ever published a single digital byte. This is not a new feature, its just the publisher taking advantage of something people are already doing.

    “Simplified game mastering.” This isn’t a new feature at all. Its a fix for the way they fucked up 3rd Edition. Running a game simply was more or less built into 1st and 2nd Editions. If you know the players’ rules then you know enough to be the Dungeonmaster (for those non-gamers out there, the Dungeonmaster, in the most simple definition, is the person who acts as a sort of referee and arbiter for all the other players in a Dungeons & Dragons game). The 1st and 2nd Edition Dungeonmasters Guides are great books. I fully plan to stalk and destroy any creature that ever fucks with my 1st Edition DM’s Guide, because it’s a fantastic book and took me a long time to get ahold of one (thanks to DanN). But you don’t really need them. With a little thought and consideration, you can just pick up a Player’s Guide and go at it.

    I hate to judge too harshly before I’ve even seen the game, but 4th Edition is going to have to be pretty goddamned spectacular and offer all manner of pleasantness for me to be a fan. I’m not saying the book needs to get me laid or anything, but after the crap that was Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition, I think a few blowjobs are certainly in order.

    Ain't no school like da old school!

    The edition that started it all.

  6. DanM Says:

    Just curious, has any gamer out there ever played a D&D character (starting from first level) long enough to EARN enough experience points to reach 20th level, let alone 30th level?

  7. Chris Says:

    Take the quiz and share your results. As for mine, I did not see this coming…

    I AM
    66%
    MEGATRON
    Take the Transformers Quiz
    icon_large.jpg
  8. Mrs.X Says:
    I AM
    59%
    STARSCREAM
    Take the Transformers Quiz
  9. DanM Says:
    I AM
    60%
    MEGATRON
    Take the Transformers Quiz
  10. Chris Says:

    I’m starting to feel a little self-conscious here. I wish Mark would hurry up and take this test. I’m sure if he answers all the questions honestly he’ll be more evil than me.

    By the way, here are the other two possibilities:

    I AM
    0%
    OPTIMUS PRIME

    I AM
    0%
    BUMBLEBEE

  11. Mrs.X Says:

    Check this out. I actually got this from ESPN its from a column on page 2 of ESPN.com called The Monday Morning Quarterback. This guy basically rants on everything from sports to movies to pop culture etc. I totally agree with him about Spidey and his body producing the webbing. That has always been my biggest problem with the movies;

    Spider-Man becomes Superman: TMQ didn’t think “Spider-Man 3″ was as bad as reviewers contended. Sure the plot was disjointed — that’s the life of a superhero, you just never know when the next runaway neutron beam will turn a store clerk into an evil super-being. But the flow of information in the movie seemed messed up. At the end, Sandman knows Spider-Man is Peter Parker and Uncle Ben was Peter’s guardian. How does Sandman discover this? He doesn’t have any special mental powers; he’s just an escaped con who accidentally was transformed into a 40-foot-tall sand monster.

    Meanwhile, the professor at the university where Peter takes his advanced physics class — and where, inexplicably, the fashion model Blonde Bombshell is taking the same advanced physics class — seems awfully blasé about discovering an extraterrestrial life form that alters human DNA. Somehow, I think the professor would have done a little more than call Peter to tell him the stuff he wanted tested was a sinister extraterrestrial life form, then put the extraterrestrial life form into a jar and gone home for the night.

    Here are my two complaints about the transfer of Spider-Man from comic to cinema. First, Mary Jane. In the comics, M.J. is ballsy, independent, fun-loving and fast; in the movies, all she does is whimper and fall off skyscrapers. The comic book M.J. was sexually aggressive: She was one of the first female characters in popular culture to be presented as sex-loving but also well-adjusted and successful, rather than stuck in standard Madonna-or-whore stereotypes. In the comic books, Mary Jane and Peter have an interesting relationship because M.J. is an independent woman and sexually self-confident, whereas Peter is withdrawn and would rather study chemistry books than get busy.

    In the movies, M.J.’s self-confidence is gone; the Mary Jane character is so passive and whiny, you wince whenever she enters the frame. Why did the producers of Spider-Man feel they had to enfeeble the Mary Jane character? (Note: Natural blonde Kirsten Dunst dyed her hair red to play Mary Jane, and natural redhead Bryce Dallas Howard died her hair blond to play Spider-Man’s new love interest, Gwen Stacy.)

    AP Photo

    In the movies, Spider-man can fly! And just where are those webs coming from?
    My second complaint is Spidey’s web-slingers. In the comics, the spider bite gives Peter disproportionate strength and keen senses, but that’s all. Using his knowledge of chemistry, he invents a spider-silk fluid, then designs mechanical shooters he wears on his forearms. The web shooters have limited range and are used sparingly because running out of fluid is a constant problem. These restrictions on Spidey’s power mean that in the comic books he must outsmart foes. In the comics, he’s a smart guy in a mask with really fast reflexes.

    In the movies, Spider-Man has become Superman plus webs. He’s constantly depicted as, in effect, flying by leaping off skyscrapers — although we never see how he gets to the tops of the skyscrapers in the first place! — then shooting a web hundreds or thousands of feet to snag on another building. Making Spider-Man fly introduces into the Spidey movies a disregard for the laws of physics that drives TMQ crazy in the era of computer-generated special effects. If Spider-Man actually leaped off a 60-story building, then shot a web up to the top of another just as he as about to hit the ground, the web would need to travel away from his body at thousands of feet per second. Then, even if we assume some perfectly efficient binding substance that sticks the web to the top of the building, when the angular momentum of Spidey’s fall was transferred up the silk to the building, the force would rip apart whatever the web stuck to. That is, even if we assume superpowers for Spidey and his web fluid, the buildings of Manhattan are still made of normal materials that would fail if used the way the movies depict Spider-Man using them.

    More annoying is that in the movies, Parker does not design the web-shooters — webs just come out of his arms. The spider bite gave him a web-shooting power, and apparently a power to make openings in his arms that instantly appear and instantly heal, although we never actually see this. In the movies, there is no limit to the amount of webbing Spidey can shoot, which allows him to swing across buildings like crazy and engage in lengthy special-effects battles. This renders a lot of the movie action really silly.

    AP Photo

    Peter Parker’s paramours suffer hair-color confusion issues.
    And where is the mass of the web fluid coming from? Spider silk is strong for its weight — industrial chemists continue to study the stuff — but in some of the lengthy battle scenes of “Spider-Man 3,” Peter shoots what must add up to dozens of pounds of fluid. This mass must originate somewhere: Are we to believe the spider bite gave Spider-Man the ability to materialize mass? If the webbing is made biologically within Peter’s body, not chemically in a lab as in the comic books, Peter would need to eat an amount of mass at least equivalent to the weight of webs he shoots. So, if he shoots 10 pounds of webbing in a dustup with Little Goblin, he would need to consume at least 10 pounds of food — probably quite a bit more. Even if he has a spider stomach that can hold and digest 10 pounds of food, Peter would be eating constantly, in huge quantities, if his body were generating a substance he expelled in large amounts. The comic book reality for Peter Parker avoided this problem, and thus was believable as long as you accepted the spider bite premise. In the movie reality, even if you accept the premise, what happens still makes no sense on a physical law basis.

    Spider-Man-as-Superman, his powers far greater in the movies than in the comics, mirrors what Hollywood did to Supe himself. In the original Superman stories (up to the “infinite crisis” and “reboot” versions of D.C. Comics; since then, continuity has gone out the window and nothing adds up), Clark Kent was very strong, could leap such long distances he appeared to fly, had X-ray and heat vision, and could exert a hypnotic power on those within his field of view. By the television show, Supe’s hypnotic power had disappeared, but he had acquired the ability to just plain fly.

    Still, Superman needed to breathe and eat — he was, after all, a carbon-based biological being. Clark had other restrictions, such as needing regular exposure to sunlight. Krypton orbited a dying red star; radiation from our solar system’s young yellow sun gave Kent his super-strength. Supe’s television super-strength had limits, and he couldn’t fly in space any longer than he could hold his breath. In the movies, Superman is so ultrastrong he can reverse the rotation of the Earth, and he’s able to even more than fly faster than the speed of light. In “Superman Returns,” the 2006 remake of the first “Superman” movie, Supe can remain in space for two and a half years without breathing or eating as he travels an enormous distance at warp speed.

    Power at this level makes Superman invincible, which is why all four Superman movies involve some tedious variation on the Man of Steel losing his powers — otherwise he couldn’t be threatened. In the comics, Superman did not need to lose his powers constantly to set a plot in motion because he was not invincible. The movie version of Spider-Man now faces the same problem as the movie-version Superman. In the movies, Spidey has become so Superman-like that it’s inconceivable any villain could defeat him, and thus there is no tension.

  12. DanM Says:

    Did this guy even watch the movies? Spiderman, invincible? The Green Goblin took him out in 2 seconds flat with knock out gas. Had the Goblin not been interested in recruiting him, Spidey would have been toast.

    In the second movie, Doc Oc pretty much kicked Spiderman’s ass in every fight scene. Had Aunt May not interfered on the clock tower, Spidey would have been skewered. He would have faced the same fate in the warehouse, had he not used his quick wits to pull the power cable up to intercept Doc Oc’s spike. Even then, he had to TALK his way out of being killed by one of Doc Oc’s rogue arms.

    To say that Spiderman has become Superman-like is just plain retarded. In any of these movies he could have been easily “defeated”. The problem is that doesn’t sell tickets. Who the hell is going to pay to watch Spiderman lose?

  13. Chris Says:

    I would. I want to see the heroes of my movies get the shit beat out of them before they beat the bad guys. As a matter of fact, I expect it. It makes me feel like they’ve earned the victory. I wouldn’t give a shit about John McLaine if he’d had boots on. I want to see him run barefoot across broken glass. Would Indy’s victory after the fight on the truck have been so fantastic if he hadn’t been thrown through the windshield and shot in the arm? I don’t like it when heroes don’t get hurt. I want to see them face life and death. Give me a movie where the good guys really have to work for their victories, and I’ll appreciate it much more.

    I would also pay to see Superman lose. I want to see The Death Of Superman story arc in a well-made movie. I want to see Doomsday and Superman literally beat each other to death for two hours, destroying most of downtown Metropolis in the process. If it was told the way it was told in the comics, with them hitting each other so hard the shockwaves shattered all the glass in the nearby skyscrapers, it would be so fantastic. I’ll bet Bryan Singer could pull it off.

  14. DanM Says:

    Spiderman did get the shit beat out of him in the first two movies.
    Getting the shit beat out of you only to come out victorious in the end is not losing.
    Losing is what happened to Superman when he got killed by Doomsday. And your going to get your wish on that….sort of. DC comics will be releasing an animated movie on September 17th called Superman Doomsday, based on that storyline. It will carry a PG-13 rating.

    http://www.dccomics.com/news/?nw=7921

  15. Mrs.X Says:

    Personally I’m just glad that someone else besides me that I’ve seen anyway finally ranted about the fact that Spiderman was never able to make his own webbing. I think that’s why I’ve never seen the other 2 movies, to me that was such an oversight I didn’t care how good the action was (is) in the other movies I just can’t get past that fact.

  16. Chris Says:

    DanM - You’re missing my point. In a series of films as successful as the Spider-Man movies have been, you know they’re going to end on a high note. So have him lose at the end of a movie. Have him go through some serious low times, like the end of The Empire Strikes Back. That’s what I want to see. If they’re gonna make a series of films, have one end badly. It’ll make the next one that much more interesting.

    Mrs. X - Yeah, I can totally see where you’re coming from. But I still think you should check out Spider-Man 2. He encounters the “running out of webbing” issue, which I thought was handled pretty well in the context of the story set up in the first film. Just avoid Spider-Man 3 at all costs. Its not a good movie.

  17. DanM Says:

    I do understand your point.
    I think the problem is we have different definitions of what losing is.
    Suffering a series of setbacks that bring a character to low point, like in Empire Strikes Back, is not what I consider losing.
    To me, losing implies that a character has some experience which produces consequences that are irrevocable and impossible to overcome.

  18. Mrs.X Says:

    Hey I pulled this off of a blog I reguarly look at (it is a political blog) I have no desire to discuss politics on here, but I thought this post was just to good to pass up. Personally I think Dinosaurs with rocket launchers on them = hillarious.

    If someone can tell me how to post pictures on this site I will post the artist’s rendering that went along with the post.

    It’s Time to Move Our Military into the 21st Century with Dinosaurs with Rocket Launchers on Them
    Posted by Frank J. at 10:36 AM

    Our military is very good at what it does: killing foreigners and breaking their stuff. Still, America isn’t feared enough abroad because of all the whiners and second-guessers at home. To make up for this will take extreme measures. Thus it’s time for the weapon our generals have been dreaming about since the Civil War: Dinosaurs with rocket launchers on them.

    rocket_dino2.jpg

    We need to put all our money into researching how to resurrect dinosaurs and then put rocket launchers on them. When our pathetic little enemies see dinosaurs coming at them launching rockets, they are going to give up. “How can we expect to succeed over dinosaurs with rocket launchers on them?” they’ll exclaim. “We must surrender now and hope the Americans will let us worship their obviously superior god.”

    I would expect all terrorism to end within a month of us first deploying dinosaurs with rocket launchers making this an investment well worth the money. Some may worry that we will have trouble controlling dinosaurs with rocket launchers, but I think they will listen to us as long as we are nice to them and talk to them in soothing voices saying, “Good dino. Good.” All dinosaurs with rocket launchers on them want is love.

  19. Chris Says:

    DanM - Can we at least agree that Spider-Man 4 should be focused on Mary Jane losing? First losing her voice, then her clothing, then her head? That’s what I’d like to see. Or Mary Jane vs Doomsday. That would be even better. The could have Dr. Strange guest star and keep resurrecting her so that Doomsday could kill her over and over again in increasingly amusing ways. One punch from Doomsday, BAM! Mary Jane chunky salsa.

    Mrs. X - It’s kind of a pain to post pics from your end, but I’ll send you some instructions. In the mean time, I’ve updated your comment with the image. I’ve darkened it to make it easier to read. Click the pic to check out the original page.

  20. Chris Says:

    Seeing how this site has been getting an unusual amount of Ghostbusters attention recently, the timing of Bill Murray in the news couldn’t be better… for us. Mouser filled me in on this a couple of days ago. Here’s what he had to say:

    mouser01.jpg No word if he was out to kill all the golfers. - 8/23/2007

    Bill Murray Arrested for Drunk Driving in a Golf Cart

    Hollywood star Bill Murray has been arrested on suspicion of drunk driving in a golf cart in the Swedish capital Stockholm. The actor was stopped by police in the early hours of Sunday and alcohol was smelled on his breath, according Stockholm police detective inspector Christer Holmlund. Holmlund says, “He refused to blow in the (breath test) instrument, citing American legislation. So we applied the old method - a blood test. It will take 14 days before the results are in.” Murray - who is in the city attending a golf tournament - signed a document admitting driving under the influence and permitted a police officer to enter a guilty plea on his behalf if the case goes to court. The 56-year-old will only be charged if his blood alcohol level is higher than the legal limit. If it is excessively high he could face a prison sentence - but a fine is more likely. Holmlund adds, “There were no obvious signs, like when someone is really tipsy.” The officer claims mystery surrounds the golf cart and who owns it - although Murray isn’t facing theft charges: “It was a golf cart. How it ended up in this predicament I don’t know. I have done this since 1968 and I’ve never experienced anything like this.”

    It was inevitable that Top5 would take a jab at it. Here’s what they came up with:

    ============================================
    T H E T O P 5 L I S T
    So easy a TopFive contributor could do it.
    ———————-
    TopFive.com — The Web’s Best Original Humor
    ============================================

    August 23, 2007

    NOTE FROM CHRIS:

    Actor Bill Murray was pulled over by Swedish police early Monday while driving a golf cart through downtown Stockholm under the influence of alcohol.

    The Top 16 Bill Murray Excuses

    16> “I’m sorry, officer, but I thought this was Amsterdam. I get away with all kinds of shit there.”

    15> “I was chasing this gopher, see…”

    14> “Of course I know there’s a Swede limit in speedin’!”

    13> “What can I say? I have a helluva slice.”

    12> “Thought I’d troll and flash my pimp cred in case Elin Nordegren-Woods has an older sister in town. Rowr!”

    11> “I’m rehearsing a scene for ‘Swedish Meatballs’.”

    10> “About time you guys showed up! Give me an escort — there’s a Saab executive who ran out of Tuborg on the 15th tee!”

    9> “I’m caddying for Tiger’s brother, Norwegian Woods.”

    8> “I can’t take breathalyzer tests — I’m still full of booze from my ‘Saturday Night Live’ days.”

    7> “This is fun. I’ve never played a par 47 before.”

    6> “I was forced to take over the wheel when Bjorn Bork fell out on the freeway.”

    5> “Back off, Sven! I’m a Ghostbuster”

    4> “Boy, that John Daly can hit a ball. Have you seen a Titleist 4?”

    3> “I’m not Bill Murray. I’m my brother, John Murray.”

    2> “Lord, this is the biggest IKEA ever! Where the heck is the kitchenware?”

    and Topfive.com’s Number 1 Bill Murray Excuse…

    1> “Nobody told me there was a police hazard on this course!”

    [ Copyright 2007 by Chris White/TopFive.com ]

    ============================================
    The Runner Up and Honorable Mention submissions for today’s list “Jokebusters!” and “Caddyslack” are in our ClubTop5 version, along with much, MUCH more!
    Join today: http://www.topfive.com/html/ClubTop5.shtml
    ============================================

    Selected from 107 submissions from 41 contributors.
    Today’s Top 5 List authors are:

    Douglas Frank, Crosby, TX — 1, 11 (Woohoo! 1st #1!)
    Nathan C. Sherman, Bellevue, WA — 2
    Sandra Hull, Arlington, VA — 3, 11 (Hall of Famer)
    Curtis Stoddard, Cedar Hills, UT — 4
    Fred Hesby, Portland, OR — 5
    Tristan Fabriani, Passaic, NJ — 6, Topic
    Andrew Hackard, Austin, TX — 7
    Greg Preece, Toronto, Canada — 8
    Paul Wiley, Westtown, NY — 9
    Larry Hollister, Concord, CA — 10 (Hall of Famer)
    Richard Skora, Columbus, OH — 11
    Carl Knorr, Devo City, OH — 12 (Hall of Famer)
    Trish Jensen, Reedsville, PA — 13
    Stephen A. Segall, Poplar Bluff, MO — 14
    Matt Moore, Fresno, CA — 15, 16
    Bruce W. Alter, Fairfax Station, VA — 15
    David Kass, Queens, NY — 15 (Hall of Famer)
    Michael Cunningham, Woodridge, IL — 15
    Kim Moser, New York, NY — 15 (Hall of Famer)
    Lori Petterson, Fairfax, VA — 15
    Dawson Rambo, Santa Rosa, CA — 15
    Charles Gulledge, Richardson, TX — Banner Tag
    Chris White, Studio City, CA — List owner/editor
    Black Flag, Los Angeles, CA — Ambience
    Ambience explained: http://www.topfive.com/arcs_am/am082307.shtml

    ============================================
    Copyright 2007 by Chris White
    All rights reserved.
    Do not publish or broadcast without permission.

    T H E T O P 5 L I S T
    http://www.topfive.com
    ============================================

  21. DanM Says:

    I love Star Wars, just as much as the next person, probably more; but give me a break.

    How much money are they going to waste on this stunt?

    Luke’s Lightsaber Heads Into Space

    The original prop of Luke Skywalker’s lightsaber from the first Star Wars movie will be sent into space aboard the space shuttle Discovery in October to commemorate the film franchise’s 30th anniversary, according to a joint announcement from Lucasfilm, the Space Center Houston and Southwest Airlines on Aug. 27.

    The prop will be flown to Houston on Aug. 28 from its current home at Lucasfilm headquarters in Northern California.

    An actor dressed as Chewbacca will hand the lightsaber over to representatives from NASA’s Space Center Houston during a ceremony at Oakland International Airport.

    Upon landing in Houston, the lightsaber will be escorted by costumed stormtroopers, alongside R2-D2 and other Star Wars characters, to a caravan of Hummers with a police escort. It will be transported for safekeeping to NASA’s Space Center Houston, where it will be secured inside the vault once used to store samples from the moon until it is ready for its trip into space.

  22. Chris Says:

    Who, NASA? It won’t cost them a dime. Despite all the fuel/weight ratio stuff you see in the movies, the shuttle carries plenty of extra fuel and the crew are all allowed to bring personal items up to a certain weight. This will be a negligible load as far as the shuttle and crew are concerned. They might even make a little money depending on whether or not they charged Lucas to fly this thing up there. Personally, I think they should take Lucas himself up there. And leave him.

  23. DanM Says:

    It may not be much but somebody still has to pay for the actors, the security while transporting the lightsaber to the ceremony,the ceremony itself, and the caravan of Hummers with police escort.

    I guess I find the whole pomp and circumstance surrounding the event to be annoying. It’s an effin movie prop.

  24. Chris Says:

    Yeah, but all that cost would be on LucasFilm. If they want to waste their money on meaningless self-indulgent crap to massage Lucas’s ego, I say let ‘em. Beats spending that money on another waste of time Star Wars movie.

  25. DanM Says:

    True. The man needs to learn how to move on, give it a rest, or pass the torch on to someone far more capable.

    Too bad it will never happen.

  26. Mrs.X Says:

    Damn Chris you said exactally what I was gonna say when I read this. They should take Lucas up there and leave him….let’s see him CGI his way out of that HA! Really if I was him I would wait unitl I died have my ashes put in the lightsaber and then launched.

  27. DanM Says:

    The trailer for Alien vs. Predator: Requiem is online.

    http://www.avp-r.com/trailer.html

    Looks like it will be a blood bath, which in my opinion is a good thing because the first AVP movie was far too tame.

    Now, if they can just change that lame ass title before it’s released…

  28. Chris Says:
    avp-requiem-01.jpg

    HOLY SHIT!!!

    Even the trailer is rated R! That means the trailer is more violent and bloodsoaked than the entire first movie. Sweet!

    I’m not saying this is gonna be a great movie, because I just can’t tell from this little footage. But this looks like it has the potential to be AWESOME.

    A few issues I have with the AvP films:

    1. I never liked the idea that the aliens have made it to Earth. Part of Ripley’s entire drive in the Alien movies is that she was preventing that from happening. Then along comes Alien vs. Predator to say “Tough shit, it already happened, and it happened on Antarctica when it was a jungle 10,000 years ago, which it wasn’t.” Bad science and bad storytelling.

    2. Apparently, the aliens are loose in the woods on Earth, in a place remote enough to allow hunting. If that’s true, then guess what? Earth is fucking DONE. It’s like Ripley said, “… if one of those things gets down here, then that will be all! And all this, this bullshit that you think is so important, you can just kiss all that goodbye!” In Alien 3 they showed that a xenomorph not only has the ability to gestate in something as small as a dog (or as large as an ox, depending on which version you watch), but also that it takes on some of the characteristics of the host. Xenomorphs that gestate inside humans walk upright, those from dogs run on all fours. What the fuck is going to happen when these things are freed over a hunting area that may be hundreds of square miles of uninhabited wilderness? What happens when they gestate inside deer, coyotes, stray dogs, or, god forbid, wolves bears, or wildcats? Humanity is fucking toast, that’s what. I give alien eggs in the wild 12 hours tops before something suitable comes along to gestate inside. Any longer than that, and it’s goodbye Mother Earth. You can see from the trailer that a facehugger got that hunter, so there are some undeveloped xenomorphs running around in the fucking woods. Unless that was the only one down there, this upcoming movie is going to have a lot of explaining to do.

    3. These movies are modern day. Fuck that; these films should be set in the future, where we can watch a Predator wipe out xenomorphs as well as dozens of overconfident Colonial Marines. That would kick so much ass that I just peed myself thinking about it.

    4. Honestly, if I see another movie with a hot girl wearing a tank top and shooting a machine gun to prove that a girl can be tough as well as sexy ’cause Grrl Power Rulez!, I’m gonna drive to Hollywood and stab the bitch in the face with a fork. What is this clichéd bullshit? It’s not new. It’s not innovative. It doesn’t even carry a message, other than to say, “We the filmmakers saw someone else do this in another crappy movie and we’re copying it here because we are unoriginal and need to be slowly beaten to death with a shovel.” The only actress in the world who should be allowed to wear a tank top and fire a machine gun ever again is Linda Hamilton, because she looks like she knows what she’s doing. If Linda Hamilton pointed a machine gun at me I’d be extremely concerned. If Angelina Jolie or Milla Jovovich or whomever the hell this new pair of tits is ever took aim at me, I’d stand motionless, confident in the fact that I was perfectly safe with the gun in their talentless, emaciated, stick-figure arms. Aliens spray acid blood, ladies. You might wanna think about something with sleeves.

  29. DanM Says:

    Yikes. Let it go people. You’ve already made three abysmal movie sequels and destroyed a decent TV series.

    http://www.scifi.com/highlander5/

  30. Chris Says:

    Yeah, but really how much worse could it get? Highlander 2 was easily one of the worst sci-fi movies I’ve ever seen, and considering that a lot of sci-fi is done very low budget and with minimal regard to quality or story, that would place it high in the running for worst movie EVER. The Highlander sequels have all been better than Highlander 2, which isn’t difficult. I can’t imagine this movie would be any different. The Highlander franchise has already been driven into the ground. I say let them make all the movies they want. Maybe one will good by accident. What could it hurt?

  31. DanM Says:

    Sorry, but to me that’s like saying “let’s beat a dead horse, it might get up and walk again.”
    Why waste the money? They already f#$ked up the storyline beyond repair.
    Guess I’m just too much of a loyalist to the original movie.

  32. Chris Says:

    There’s no such thing as fucking a story up beyond repair.

    The problem with your way is that it closes the door on the possibility of a good sequel coming out of the ashes, so to speak. I’m a HUGE fan of Highlander. Not the series (which I’ve never seen), nor the sequels (of which all the ones I’ve seen have sucked), but Highlander. That’s why I would love to see a direct sequel made, like with Superman Returns.

    Look what happened with the Superman movies. I think pretty much everyone in the world would agree that Superman II could have been a lot less slapstick comedy and a lot more super. And Superman III and IV were just pure shit. But if they’d just closed the book on it, Bryan Singer would never have been able to come along and rework the story. He never would have been given the chance to just ignore parts III and IV outright and make a direct sequel to Superman II to get the franchise going in the right direction again.

    I think what they need to do is focus on getting back to the roots of the story. Forget everything except the first film. Get a new actor to play Connor MacLeod. Get a new Kurgan… actually, no; Clancy Brown is still in good shape and is too awesome to replace. Place it in any era between 1541 and 1985. That’s a huge swath of very interesting history just waiting to be explored.

    Get a new actor to guest star as Ramírez now and then in flashback, or maybe have the occasional episode dedicated to showing his adventures. He was born before Christ, for god’s sake. Tell us where he came from, how he lived, about his mentor Graham Ashe that watched out for him the way he watched out for Connor. There’s got to be something a decent writer can do with all that material.

    There’s a lot of life left in the original movie, if they’d just go back and get it. They can also steal the few bits and pieces of the sequels and series that aren’t completely stupid, and leave the rest to rot. Stop focusing on this Duncan MacLeod guy and stick with the original movie. There’s lots of great stories in there just waiting to be told.

  33. DanM Says:

    They had their chance (on numerous occasions) to fix it and failed. Hell, the TV show was pretty good until they threw in that subplot with the Watchers. All they had to do was have Connor kill Duncan in the series finale and that part of the franchise would have been fine. But no, they had to make a whole brand new movie where Duncan, and not Connor became the last, totally negating everything that made the first movie great.
    Yes, there is the potential for numerous stories set prior to the original movie, but the chuckleheads in charge of the franchise aren’t smart enough to go there. And even if they got bright and pursued that route it still wouldn’t excuse the awful movie sequals they spewed out of their asses, plus they’d probably find some way to f@$k them up too.

  34. Chris Says:

    Your replacement characters in the word ‘fuck’ are causing it to be read as an email address. That’s pretty funny. It never occurred to me that would happen. XHTML errors are hil@rious.

    By the way, it’s okay to use the actual word. This is an adult site for adult readers. And adults not only like to fuck, but here in the US of A, are the only ones legally allowed to do so. WARNING: If anybody out there can’t handle seeing the word fuck, then never, ever, ever read anything with the labels “posted by Chris” or “Chris says.” You will probably not like what’s inside.

  35. Quentin Says:

    WARNING: If anybody out there can’t handle seeing the word fuck, then fuck you, you fucking mother fucker.

    (Was that too much? Fuck. I thought so, but then I thought, “What the fuck, let’s fucking go for it!” Guess I fucked up.)

  36. Mrs.X Says:

    Aw Fuck I forgot what I was gonna say :)

  37. Chris Says:

    You fucking forgot what the fuck you were gonna say? Well fuck it, then. :D

  38. Chris Says:

    vader-philips-lights-400.jpg

  39. Chris Says:

    New article coming tonight. I promise. Really. Pinky swear.

  40. DanM Says:

    We’ve heard that before :)

  41. Mrs.X Says:

    There fucking better be a new fucking article :)

  42. Chris Says:

    Sweet Jesus… I’m gonna get performance anxiety.

    Hey, for anyone who likes to be made love to with sound waves, DanM, THO Girl and I went to see Rush on Saturday night. It was pretty sweet. They had a great intro to “Tom Sawyer” with the boys from South Park. Check it out:

Leave a Reply

Indeed!